Before this month, many may not have encountered the name John Pavlovitz. Suddenly, his editorials began circulating on social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter, often shared within Christian circles. However, the content of these articles struck some as theologically unconventional. As individuals committed to sound doctrine and discerning those who contradict it, understanding who John Pavlovitz is and what he represents becomes crucial. A brief investigation into his online presence reveals a perspective that warrants careful examination, especially for those grounded in traditional Christian beliefs.
It takes minimal exploration of his blog to discern that John Pavlovitz deviates from established biblical authority. Identifying himself as a pastor, and even a “rogue pastor” formerly associated with a Methodist church in North Carolina on his Facebook page, Pavlovitz positions himself within a Christian context. Yet, his writings often present viewpoints that stand in contrast to traditional church teachings and interpretations of scripture.
To understand the nature of his teachings, examining some of his widely circulated articles is essential. The following analysis will delve into three specific pieces published through external sources, highlighting areas of concern and inviting readers to critically assess why embracing and sharing John Pavlovitz’s articles might be problematic from a doctrinally sound perspective.
Deconstructing the Bible? Examining “5 Things I Wish Christians Would Admit About the Bible”
In his article, “5 Things I Wish Christians Would Admit About the Bible,” published by Relevant Magazine, John Pavlovitz articulates a desire for readers to “free themselves” from the perceived “burden” of deeply understanding the Bible. This sentiment immediately raises concerns for those who believe in the importance of diligent scriptural study, as emphasized in 2 Timothy 2:15, urging believers to be workers “who have no need to be ashamed, rightly handling the word of truth.”
Notably, in an article centered on the Bible, Pavlovitz conspicuously avoids referencing it directly. The closest he comes is a link to 2 Timothy 3:16, which he controversially interprets out of context. He suggests that scripture being “God-breathed” implies it is merely as inspirational as personal experiences, rather than recognizing its inherent divine authority. In contrast, the traditional understanding of 2 Timothy 3:16 underscores the Bible’s authoritative nature for teaching, rebuking, correcting, and training in righteousness, equipping believers for every good work.
Pavlovitz appears to hold a diminished view of the Bible’s significance, equating it with “most great works throughout history.” His concluding point culminates in the assertion that “God is bigger than the Bible.” To illustrate this, he recounts an experience with the ocean, proposing it as analogous to experiencing God. He then writes, “I wish more Christians would admit that the Bible, at its most perfect and inspired, is a collection of words about the ocean. They are not the ocean itself. God is the ocean.”
For many Christians, this analogy is deeply problematic. The Bible is not merely a collection of words about God, but is considered the very Word of God. To separate God from His Word is a departure from foundational Christian theology. Psalm 138:2 states, “you have exalted above all things your name and your word,” highlighting the inseparable connection. Furthermore, John 1:1 proclaims, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” Such fundamental scriptures underscore the divine nature and authority of the Bible, a perspective seemingly undermined in Pavlovitz’s interpretation. His approach raises questions about his understanding of core biblical principles and his role as a supposed teacher of God’s Word.
“Dear Church, Here’s Why People Are Really Leaving You”: A Critique of Church Culture or a Theological Misunderstanding?
In “Dear Church, Here’s Why People Are Really Leaving You,” published on ChurchPlants.com, John Pavlovitz offers a critique of modern church practices. While some of his observations might resonate with certain experiences, the underlying premise and direction of his critique diverge significantly from a biblically grounded understanding of the church. For instance, his criticism that “Your Sunday productions have worn thin” may echo sentiments about churches prioritizing performance over genuine worship, a concern voiced by many.
However, Pavlovitz’s broader intention appears to extend beyond constructive admonition. While he may initially engage readers with relatable points, the core of his argument seems rooted in a secular or humanistic perspective rather than a spiritual one. A detailed point-by-point rebuttal might be unnecessary, as the fundamental issue lies in his apparent misunderstanding of the very essence of the church. Having previously questioned his understanding of the Bible, this article casts doubt on his comprehension of ecclesiology, the study of the church.
The church, from a biblical perspective, is not simply a social gathering of like-minded individuals united by shared values. It is, as scripture defines, “the body of Christ” (1 Corinthians 12:27). Membership in this body, according to scripture, is not based on mere association but on a spiritual transformation. It comprises those reconciled to God through Christ’s death (2 Corinthians 5:18), predestined for adoption into God’s family (Ephesians 1:5), and being conformed to the image of Christ (Romans 8:29). (For a more in-depth, scriptural explanation of the church’s nature, resources like this video can be helpful.)
True followers of Christ constitute the church. Following Jesus extends beyond intellectual assent or acknowledging His divinity; even demons recognize that (Mark 5:7). It involves obedience to His commands, stemming from salvation through His finished work (1 John 5:1-2). Disobedience, conversely, excludes one from His life, remaining under God’s judgment (John 3:36).
The Bible provides guidance on addressing sin within the church community. Galatians 6:1 encourages correction for those overtaken in sin. 1 Corinthians 5:9-13 further instructs the church to purge from its fellowship those who claim to be believers but persist in unrepentant sin. Unsaved individuals attending church are also, by definition, in unrepentant sin and, according to Romans 8:9 and Philippians 3:3, are not spiritually equipped for true worship.
Therefore, those who genuinely leave the church, from a biblical viewpoint, might be revealing that they were never truly part of it (1 John 2:19). Pavlovitz’s article, in presuming to enlighten spiritually discerning individuals about why people leave the church, arguably demonstrates a lack of understanding of the spiritual dynamics at play and the true nature of the Christian community. His critique seems to operate from a fundamentally different understanding of what the church is meant to be.
“What the Continued Crucifying of Rob Bell Says About Modern Christianity”: Defending False Teaching?
In “What the Continued Crucifying of Rob Bell Says About Modern Christianity,” also published by Relevant Magazine, John Pavlovitz again presents a perspective that aligns with controversial figures and questions established Christian discernment. He writes, “It’s often been said that we Christians eat our own. This unsettling expression is all-too true, and apparently Rob Bell is on the menu yet again.”
This statement immediately raises concerns regarding Pavlovitz’s theological judgment. Rob Bell is widely considered a false teacher due to his departure from core Christian doctrines, particularly evident in his book Love Wins, which challenges traditional understandings of hell and salvation. While some may have initially been drawn to Bell’s engaging style, his teachings have been identified as heretical by many within orthodox Christianity.
The assertion that Bell is being “crucified” or “eaten” by Christians for being exposed as a false teacher is hyperbolic and misrepresents the situation. Sound teachers warning against Bell’s teachings are not engaging in persecution but fulfilling their biblical mandate to protect the flock from doctrinal error (2 Timothy 3:5-6, 1 Peter 5:8). Bell’s continued platform, including his own talk show produced by Oprah Winfrey, hardly suggests he is being marginalized or unfairly treated. Instead, it indicates his embrace by secular culture, further distancing him from orthodox Christian circles.
| “Okay, audience, chant with me now: Oooooo-praaaaaaahh” |
Conclusion: Discernment is Key
John Pavlovitz titles his blog “Stuff That Needs to Be Said.” However, a critical examination of his writings suggests the opposite. His content often appears to be theologically shallow, emotionally driven, and critical of core Christian beliefs and practices. It often lacks a focus on Christ-centeredness and provides little to no edification for believers grounded in sound doctrine.
Christians are called to discernment (Hebrews 5:14). Engaging with and sharing content requires careful evaluation, especially when it comes to spiritual matters. John Pavlovitz’s writings, while presented within a Christian context, often undermine foundational biblical truths and promote perspectives that are inconsistent with historic Christian faith. Therefore, exercising discernment and refraining from sharing his articles is a prudent step for those seeking to uphold sound doctrine and remain rooted in biblical truth.
For further assessment of Pavlovitz’s teachings over time, consider resources like this follow-up article which provides a continued analysis.
